Plaintiff firms across Texas

The record runs
a thousand pages.
The gap that guts it
is on page 604.

We build software for Texas plaintiff firms that reads the file the way a paralegal would with a free week — every date, every provider, every gap — and hands back a chronology cited to the page. Fixed price, six weeks, and the code is yours at the end.

Book a free 30-minute call Watch one run first

Medical chronology File 2841

Claimant Sample, J.

Providers 6 across 14 months

Pages ingested 1,184

First treatment 3 days post-loss

Treatment gap 11 weeks

Flagged No contemporaneous note between 2 May and 19 Jul. Surfaced with the record, cited to pp. 604–611, before the adjuster builds an argument out of it.

Status Ready for review 9 min from upload

Illustrative sample. Not a client record.

Houston based On site across Texas

Fixed price Agreed before we start, never hourly

You own it Code and data in your accounts

Six-week builds One workflow at a time

I Where the money goes

Nobody at your firm thinks the problem is AI. They think the problem is paper, and they are right.

A thousand pages, indexed by hand.

A paralegal reads the set, types the dates into a chronology, and loses three days doing work that is neither strategic nor billable. It is the most expensive typing in the building.
The gap surfaces when the adjuster finds it.

An eleven week break in treatment is in the file from the day the records arrive. Whether it costs you the case depends entirely on which side reads page six hundred first.
The case goes to whoever answered.

Responding inside a minute is reported to lift conversion by 391 percent. Almost nobody does it, because nothing in the firm is watching the inbox at nine at night.
You already bought software for this.

Nearly half of firms outsource records review rather than fight their own systems. That is a rational response to tools that do not fit, and it is not the same as closing the gap between the ones you own.

The part nobody reports upward

You have almost certainly bought software for this already. The people who had to use it routed around it inside two weeks, because it was built for whoever signed the contract rather than whoever opens it every morning.

II What we build

Three things that pay for themselves, and the connective work around them.

Records into a chronology

Every date, provider, procedure and gap pulled out of the set and cited back to the page it came from. What took three days takes the length of a coffee, and the output is checkable rather than trusted.

Chronology Set 4 of 7 · 1,184 pp

Treating providers 6 identified

First treatment 11 Mar, day of loss

Gap in treatment 11 weeks

Billed $84,210

Paid $19,340

Flagged Gap runs 2 May to 19 Jul with no contemporaneous note. Cited to pp. 604–611.

Reviewed by a person before it leaves 38 min

Illustrative sample. Not a client record.

Intake that answers in seconds

The first response decides the outcome more than anything that follows it. Qualified, conflict-checked and routed before the caller reaches the next firm on their list.

Intake Inbound 21:47

Source Paid search, mobile

Matter type Auto, rear-end

Conflict check Clear

Statute runs 14 months

Answered in 41 seconds

Signed Packet sent and the call routed to the on-duty attorney. No human was awake for this.

Out of hours 41 sec

Illustrative sample. Not a client record.

The document you send out

A demand letter, a records summary, a settlement brochure. Assembled from your own prior work and your own file, so the first draft takes an hour rather than a week and sounds like your firm wrote it.

Demand package Draft 1 · Ramirez

Special damages $84,210, tabulated

Exhibits 31, auto-indexed

Policy limits $250,000 confirmed

Missing Wage loss verification

Drafted in 52 minutes

Held Will not assemble without the wage documentation. It tells you what is missing rather than papering over it.

Awaiting one document 52 min

Illustrative sample. Not a client record.

The layer between your case management system, your accounting, and the spreadsheet that actually runs the firm.
Lead systems you own outright, so the cost per signed case stops being somebody else’s pricing decision.
Deadline and statute tracking that reads from the file rather than from whatever somebody remembered to enter.

III What it costs

Four things you can buy. Start with the smallest.

Intake Rebuild

$6,500

Two to three weeks

Your site gets inquiries. Some of them never get answered in time.

The smallest useful fix. We rebuild your site to turn visitors into cases, and answer new inquiries in seconds instead of hours.

A site built to do one job: turn a visitor into a signed case
Every inquiry answered in under a minute, day or night
Call tracking, so you know which ads actually win cases
Conflicts flagged at intake, not three days later

Search Foundation

$9,500

Three to four weeks

You buy all your cases. You want a source you keep.

The part of search you can own. Pages built to be found for the cases you take. The local listings that decide who shows up on the map. And the setup that gets you named by AI assistants instead of a directory.

Pages for the cases you want, on your own site
Google Business Profile and the listings behind map results
Markup that helps Google and AI tools read you as a firm
The basics most firm sites fail: speed, and a site that works on a phone
Tracking set up in your accounts, reporting to you, not to us
Written instructions so you can keep publishing without us

We do not promise rankings. Nobody honestly can. You are buying the setup and owning it, not a spot on page one.

Where most firms start

Case Pipeline

$15,000 – $25,000

Four to six weeks

You spend five figures a month on cases you do not own.

The whole pipeline, on your domain and your accounts. From the first inquiry to the review a happy client leaves at the end. It keeps working after you stop paying us.

Everything in the Intake Rebuild
New cases sorted and sent straight to the right attorney
A referral pipeline you own instead of rent
Follow-up past the first call, where most cases are lost
Automatic case updates by text and email, so clients stop calling to ask
Review requests sent when a client is happiest, not months later
A monthly number: what each signed case cost you, by source

Records and document automation

$60,000 – $90,000

Six weeks

Signing cases is not your problem. Working them is.

Medical records turned into a dated chronology, with a page number behind every line. Demands drafted from your own past work. Problems found before the other side finds them.

Records read once, returned as a dated chronology you can check
Treatment gaps and prior injuries flagged for you first
Demands drafted from the chronology, the bills and your old demands
Runs in your own cloud, on your keys. You own the code.

Before Every one of these starts with a free 30-minute call. The biggest one starts with a paid week first, the Workflow Audit, at $7,500. You get a working prototype and a fixed quote out of it, and you can stop there.

After Keeping it working costs $1,000 – $1,500 / mo. You can cancel any time, and nothing switches off if you do.

Always Fixed price. You own the code. No monthly fee to keep using it.

Most firms should start at the top of that list, not the bottom. If the numbers do not add up for you, we will say so and you will have spent nothing.

IV Why us

There are a lot of people selling AI to law firms right now. Most of them cannot build it.

Built for the paralegal, not the partner who signed: Software gets routed around when it is built for whoever bought it, and nobody tells the partner who chose it.
It fits what you already run: No replacing your case management system, no seventh login. We build the connective tissue no product company can sell you.
We build, we do not advise: There is no deck at the end of an engagement. There is software your team logs into.
Your cloud, your keys, your code: You own the source outright. No seat licenses, no revenue share, nothing to renegotiate in two years.
Fixed price, fixed scope: You get a number before we start and it does not move.

Not ready to book a call

Send us five pages of a record set. We will send back what we found in it.

Five pages is enough, redacted however you like. You get a short video back within two business days showing what a chronology would surface from it: the dates, the gaps, the things worth knowing before the other side finds them.

Send five pages of a real file. Redact whatever you like first.
We run them and record what comes out, including what it misses.
You get the video within two business days. If there is nothing worth showing, we say so.

See it working

Watch a chronology build before you talk to anyone.

Three sample record sets, each with something different buried in it, and one with nothing wrong at all. Pick one and watch it read, flag and cite. No email required to see the result.

Open the demo

The record runs a thousand pages. The gap that guts itis on page 604.

Nobody at your firm thinks the problem is AI. They think the problem is paper, and they are right.

Three things that pay for themselves, and the connective work around them.

Records into a chronology

Intake that answers in seconds

The document you send out

Four things you can buy. Start with the smallest.

Intake Rebuild

Search Foundation

Case Pipeline

Records and document automation

There are a lot of people selling AI to law firms right now. Most of them cannot build it.

Send us five pages of a record set. We will send back what we found in it.

Watch a chronology build before you talk to anyone.

The record runs
a thousand pages.
The gap that guts it
is on page 604.