What things cost and how long they take, with the source next to each one.
Every figure we cite anywhere on this site, collected, attributed and dated. Free to quote with a link. If a number here is wrong or has moved, tell us and we will correct it.
Read the provenance column. Several of these come from vendor-published reports with an interest in the answer. That does not make them wrong, and it does mean they should be attributed to the vendor rather than laundered into "research shows". We have marked which is which.
Records and document work
The largest single cost in a plaintiff practice that nobody invoices for.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outsourced review, 1,200-page file | ~$4,500 | Roughly $3.75 a page for that scenario. Rush work costs more. | RapidCare Vendor report |
| Records retrieval fees | $0.25 – $1.00+ / page | Statutory, and varies by state. California at the low end; Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania above a dollar. | Codes Health Vendor report |
| Firms outsourcing records review | 47.4% | Cited as a response to complexity rather than cost. | Codes Health Vendor report |
| US records retrieval market | $1.1bn | Projected for 2026. | Codes Health Market figure |
| Chronology, routine treating file | 1 – 1.5 days | Reported by firms. Provider count and legibility drive it more than page count. | Practitioner reports Industry survey |
| Chronology, several providers | 3 – 4 days | A year of records across six providers is the common shape. | Practitioner reports Industry survey |
Capacity and turnaround
The constraint most firms have never written down.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firms at or beyond capacity | 75% | Plaintiff-specific. | Supio Vendor report |
| Volume regularly exceeds team | 42% | The stronger version of the same question. | Supio Vendor report |
| Firms needing a week+ for a demand | 57% | Writing is two to three hours of that. The rest is assembly. | Supio Vendor report |
Trust in AI output
The barrier plaintiff firms name, which is not price.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will not use output they cannot verify | 99% | The most consistent finding in the plaintiff data. | Supio Vendor report |
| Concerned by missing source attribution | 96% | Very or extremely concerned. | Supio Vendor report |
| Reject fully autonomous AI | 79% | Require lawyer review of every output. | Supio Vendor report |
| Rank accuracy and traceability equally | 71% | Ahead of faster drafting or caseload relief. | Supio Vendor report |
AI adoption and governance
Individual use has outrun anything institutional.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal professionals using general AI | 69% | Up from 31% the previous year. | 8am / ABA Industry survey |
| Firms adopting legal-specific AI | 34% | Against 46% for general-purpose tools. | 8am / ABA Industry survey |
| Firms with no AI policy and no plans | 43% | Only 9% have a written, actively enforced one. | 8am / ABA Industry survey |
| Barrier: data security | 46% | Ahead of ethics at 42% and trust in results at 39%. | 8am / ABA Industry survey |
AI sanctions
What happens when output reaches a filing unverified.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Court decisions involving hallucinated material | ~1,490 | Worldwide, as of May 2026. More than 1,000 in the US. | Charlotin database Court record |
| Decisions involving licensed attorneys | ~496 | The remainder involved self-represented parties. | Charlotin database Court record |
| Sanctions issued, Q1 2026 | ~$145,000 | In three months. | ComplexDiscovery Court record |
| Largest single-attorney aggregate | $109,700 | Oregon. | ComplexDiscovery Court record |
| Steepest federal appellate sanction | $30,000 | Sixth Circuit, over two dozen fabricated citations. | Norton Rose Fulbright Court record |
Case acquisition
The spread between channels is larger than the spread within any of them.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signed case, paid search | $1,700 – $3,300 | Personal injury toward the top of the range. | Published industry figures Market figure |
| Conversion lift, response inside a minute | 391% | Against slower replies. Treat the precise multiple with suspicion; the direction is consistent. | Published industry figures Market figure |
What software costs
Our own numbers, published for the same reason as everything above.
| Metric | Figure | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| One workflow, custom built | $60k – $90k | Typically $75,000, about six weeks, fixed price. | Thrive Development Vendor report |
| Keeping software working | 15 – 25% / year | Published benchmark for software maintenance generally, not specific to legal. | Industry benchmark Market figure |
| Tech E&O insurance, developer | ~$74 – 87 / month | Bundled with cyber, around $111 a month or $1,330 a year. | Insureon, MoneyGeek Vendor report |
Sources
- Supio, plaintiff AI report
- 8am 2026 Legal Industry Report
- ABA Law Practice, on the 8am report
- Norton Rose Fulbright, gen AI sanctions
- ComplexDiscovery, Q1 2026 sanctions
- Charlotin AI hallucination database, via PlatinumIDS
- RapidCare, record review cost
- Codes Health, record request statistics
- Insureon, software developer insurance
- MoneyGeek, E&O cost report
Where a row says "practitioner reports" or "published industry figures", the number is a range we have heard consistently rather than a single citable study, and it is marked that way deliberately. Do not quote those as though they were measured.
Using this
Quote any of it. A link back is enough.
We collected these because we needed them and there was nowhere to point at. If you are writing something and want a figure checked, or you have a better source for one of these, email contact@thrivedevelopment.io and we will update the page and say who corrected it.
Not ready to book a call
Send us five pages of a record set. We will send back what we found in it.
Five pages is enough, redacted however you like. You get a short video back within two business days showing what a chronology would surface from it: the dates, the gaps, the things worth knowing before the other side finds them.
- Send five pages of a real file. Redact whatever you like first.
- We run them and record what comes out, including what it misses.
- You get the video within two business days. If there is nothing worth showing, we say so.
Book a free 30-minute call · Work out your own records figure