The demand is not slow because writing is hard.
Fifty-seven percent of firms need a week or more to send one, and the writing is two hours of that. The rest is assembly. This automates the assembly and leaves the argument where it belongs.
Held Will not assemble without the wage documentation. It tells you what is missing rather than papering over it.
What it produces
- Specials tabulated once, per case
- Pulled from the ledgers and reconciled, rather than added up twice by two people who get two answers.
- A treatment narrative from the chronology
- Built from the same dated, cited source as the exhibit index, so the two agree by construction rather than by proofreading.
- Exhibits indexed and cross-referenced
- Numbered, ordered, and matched to the paragraphs that cite them.
- Drafted in the language of your prior demands
- Your structure, your arguments, what works in your venue — assembled from what your firm has already sent, not a template.
- Missing documents flagged before drafting
- Against an independent list of who treated this person, so the absent wage verification is a week-one request rather than a day-three surprise.
Limits
What it does not do.
Stated up front, because you find these out in week two anyway and it is better if you hear them from us.
- Write the argument. Liability, causation and what the case is worth are the job, and they stay with an attorney.
- Send anything. Nothing leaves the firm without a person reading it, and the tool is built assuming that.
- Invent a number. If the bills do not reconcile it says so rather than picking one, because a wrong figure in a demand costs more credibility than a slow one.
- Proceed with a hole in the file. It will refuse to assemble a package that is missing something it knows should be there.
The question everybody asks
Can AI just write our demand letters?
It can draft one, and drafting was never the bottleneck. The useful work is upstream — turning the records into a dated, cited chronology and a reconciled damages table so the draft has something accurate to be built from. A demand drafted from a bad chronology is a fast way to send a wrong number, and a wrong number is worse than a slow one.
What it costs
- Intake Rebuild$6,500 Two to three weeks
Your site gets inquiries. Some of them never get answered in time.
- Search Foundation$9,500 Three to four weeks
You buy all your cases. You want a source you keep.
We do not promise rankings. Nobody honestly can. You are buying the setup and owning it, not a spot on page one.
- Case Pipeline Most start here$15,000 – $25,000 Four to six weeks
You spend five figures a month on cases you do not own.
- Records and document automation$60,000 – $90,000 Six weeks
Signing cases is not your problem. Working them is.
Before Every one of these starts with a free 30-minute call. The biggest one starts with a paid week first, the Workflow Audit, at $7,500. You get a working prototype and a fixed quote out of it, and you can stop there.
After Keeping it working costs $1,000 – $1,500 / mo. You can cancel any time, and nothing switches off if you do.
Always Fixed price. You own the code. No monthly fee to keep using it.
Questions a partner asks
What is demand letter automation?
Software that assembles a settlement demand from the material a firm already has: the medical chronology, the billing records, the exhibits and the firm’s own prior demands. It handles the gathering and formatting; the argument stays with an attorney.
How long does a demand take to prepare now?
Supio’s plaintiff report found 57% of firms need a week or more. Very little of that is writing. It is waiting on records, reading them, tabulating specials across several ledgers, indexing exhibits, and discovering on day three that something never arrived.
Will it sound like our firm wrote it?
It is assembled from your own prior demands rather than a template, so the structure and the language are yours. It is a first draft, and it is meant to be edited.
What if the medical records are incomplete?
It refuses to assemble and tells you what is missing. That is deliberate. A package built around a hole is worse than one that has not been built yet.
Does this work without the chronology piece?
Poorly. The demand is downstream of knowing what is in the file, so automating the assembly while the records are still unread moves the bottleneck rather than removing it. Most firms should do the records work first.
What does it cost?
It is part of the records and document build, which runs $60,000 to $90,000 as a fixed price over about six weeks. If your case volume does not clear that comfortably, we will say so.
Not ready to book a call
Send us five pages of a record set. We will send back what we found in it.
Five pages is enough, redacted however you like. You get a short video back within two business days showing what a chronology would surface from it: the dates, the gaps, the things worth knowing before the other side finds them.
- Send five pages of a real file. Redact whatever you like first.
- We run them and record what comes out, including what it misses.
- You get the video within two business days. If there is nothing worth showing, we say so.
Law firm intake software AI for personal injury law firms Medical chronology software